I do not pretend to be able to read minds. However, basic analysis, knowledge of human nature, and an understanding of socialist ideology, if applied, may grant possible insight into the truth.
Susan Rice removed herself from consideration for the post of Secretary of Defense. Her letter to Obama was published in order to enforce the left's meme that conservatives are seeking to block any action by Obama and his socialist oligarchy. In it, Ms. Rice stated:
"If nominated, I am now convinced that the confirmation process would be lengthy, disruptive and costly -- to you and to our most pressing national and international priorities.That trade-off is simply not worth it to our country ... Therefore, I respectfully request that you no longer consider my candidacy at this time."
If stated in plain English rather than politicized double-talk, it may have been stated like this: When I had to meet the Senators and answer questions on Benghazi, I had my butt handed to me. I was rude and callous in return. I burnt bridges. These influential conservative and Republican senators can sincerely slow the confirmation process enough to have time to better investigate Benghazi. In doing so, they will likely find and bring to public light other things I have done that are contrary to the ideals behind our Constitution, including some level of support for attempts to undermine the US Constitution as so many of the "Agenda 21" treaties seek to do. The people would find out that we on the left don't care about our country and want to destroy everything the US stands for. So, in order to try to keep our agenda from coming to full public light before it is fully enacted, I'll take one for the team and turn down this job.
While appearing as a guest on the race-baiting socialist pontiff of bigotry, Al Sharpton's program on MSNBC, a known socialist propaganda outlet, washed-up singer Harry Belafonte stated in response to a question about entitlement reform:
"There is this lingering infestation of a corrupt people who are trying to dismantle the wishes of the people and the mandate they were given by Barack Obama. I don't know what more they want. I want Obama to do is work like a third-world dictator and and put all of these guys [conservatives] in jail for violating American desire."
Translation: Americans have "matured" in their political awareness and have learned to ignore the US Constitution. Through the combination of voter fraud, buying votes with entitlements, and keeping students ignorant of basic civics, Obama won re-election. This shows that they want the tyrannical oligarchy that is the left's master plan. We have people who still cling to that pesky US Constitution. Obama is supreme. He is more powerful than that supreme law of the land. Anybody who exercises those pesky First Amendment rights to free speech, free press, petition of redress, and gather peacefully need to be tossed in jail for opposing Dear Leader's commands. Throw them in Gitmo. Start with the Supreme Court justices, then move on to those US Senators and Representatives that support that pesky TEA Party. Next, jail all of those conservative governors. We need to enact a hostile take-over, now. I have waited too long. I wanted this back in the days of FDR. I've waited long enough. C'mon, Barry, you promised that transformation. It's so close. Just do it before they figure us out!
NFL star Robert Griffin III made statements that he doesn't want to be defined by the color of his skin or his ethnicity. Among his statements, RG3 has alluded that he is a more conservative thinker who respects more individual merits, efforts, and achievements than he does some collectivist category that socialists love to pigeonhole people into.
In response having "left the plantation", known leftist and ESPN sports commentator Rob Parker criticized Mr. Griffin:
"My question, which is just a straight honest question: is he a brother, or is he a cornball brother? ...Well, he's black, he kind of does his thing, but he's not really down with the cause, he's not one of us. He's kind of black, but he's not really the guy you'd really want to hang out with, because he's off to do something else. I want to find about him. I don't know because I keep hearing these things. We all know he has a white fiancee. Then there was all this talk about he's a Republican, which there's no information at all. I'm just trying to dig deeper into why he has an issue. Because we did find out with Tiger Woods, Tiger Woods was like, 'I've got black skin, but don't call me black.' So people wondered about Tiger Woods."
Parker is attempting to make Robert Griffin III a pariah among sports fans because Griffin doesn't support the socialist cause. Parker even referred to "the cause" in his statement. Though he didn't elaborate which "cause" he referred to, it's more than obvious. He opposes Griffin's statement that he isn't going to be pigeonholed into that collective and fall in lock-step with anybody's sycophants. ESPN has a habit of hiring socialist sycophants and demagogues who tend to comment on things outside of the sports entertainment they are paid to discuss. A recent example of other sports commentators making socialist political statements was when Bob Costas started blaming the gun for an NFL star's murdering his wife then taking his own life.
Then Obama made some statement that RINO Speaker Boehner is trying to save face and make it look as though he isn't going to capitulate:
"I think Speaker Boehner has a contentious caucus, as his caucus is tough on him sometimes so he doesn’t want to look like he’s giving in to me somehow because that might hurt him in his own caucus."The Narcissist-in-chair believes that whether or not the House passes any fiscal cliff budget bill is solely up to Speaker Boehner. Obama believes that he has already won and that Boehner is just trying to save face. You see, according to Obama, it's just a matter of time before those pesky congressmen shut up and do what he commends. What Obama fails to recognize is that all seats in congress were elected this past November. Conservatives maintain a majority. Those representatives speak for their constituents. Through them, the people have spoken. Nowhere more than the House of Representatives is the popular vote better represented.
Obama also thinks people are stupid. He does. He honestly expects us to believe that increasing tax rates on a segment of the population to an extent that will raise just enough revenue to operate the over-sized federal bureaucracy for only 8 days is the answer to the "fiscal cliff". His statement is more along the lines of "I won by stealing money from those who earn and giving it away to the lazy through entitlement programs. Most people are lazy. You'll not be re-elected if you take away their purloined items. I already bought those votes with your money. You cannot stop me from continuing to do so. So, quit trying. Instead, go tell everybody to be prepared to give me everything they own so I can dole it out as I see fit. Nobody owns anything. I own everything. I won. get over it."
The left has been emboldened and are making mistakes in attempting to veil their agenda. Their agenda is clear. They want to be rid of the US Constitution. They want an oligarchy in charge of the planet. They want people categorized and sorted into per-determined collectives. They want collectives of dissent silenced. They want the rest meek, ignorant, and obedient. They want to do so in a way that makes it seem as though this is what each American wants. Look, Harry Belafonte even told you that it is what you want.
To commentators with ugly, angry, slur comments about Obama... Thank you!
ReplyDeleteYou are among the reasons normal people stay away from GOP and Tea Party...You racists truly ARE hateful people!
I mean really 20 kids under 9 years old get slaughtered and if anyone do not get emotional about it is well to me as sick as the ass-hole who shot them. that makes Obama a narcisisst that you black-hating racist falsely call him?
The comments on here about this are almost as sick as what this lunatic did. From these comments it's easy to see where he came from.
President Obama cares about people. You may disagree with him on certain issues, but he's not a bad person.
I have a few questions for your hateful, race-baiting empty cranium.
DeleteFirst of all, give me one example of a single racist thing I stated. Which statement was racist? What is THE definition of racism (not your made up "my definition of racism is..." bullshit, but THE definition)?
I will give you a huge hint -- I have made not a single racist statement. I challenge you to find one.
You claim that I'm "black-hating". Name one person that I hate. Next, find one person I hate because of the color of their skin and not because of their character.
Hint -- Obama is a person of very low character. In addition, he has more Caucasian blood than he does black. His father was part Arab (Asian). In fact, Obama has more "white" ancestry than I do. It's obvious you have no facts, just hate-filled emotive verbiage devoid of any reason or factual content.
It is also obvious that you are the one filled with hate, especially because you are barbaric enough to let emotions rule your actions instead of reason. That puts you in the category of lower life forms who act on instinct and emotion rather than logic and reason.
You claim my comments are "sick" yet provide no data to substantiate your slanderous remark. Where is your proof? Hint -- you have none.
You claim that Obama cares about people, yet he seeks to steal from those who have earned. If he cared, he wouldn't seek to steal. If he cared, he would support individual prosperity instead of slavery to a check provided by stealing from others.
Obama does not care about people. He does not care about me. He does not care about my natural rights or constitutional rights. He does not care about my child.
If he cared, he wouldn't purposely propose fiscal actions that will do nothing but harm the economy and enslave more people by making them dependent upon government handouts instead of being self-sufficient and prosperous.
No, he does not care.
You may see the campaigner-in-chair as a "Robin Hood". You must have failed to read that novel. Robin Hood was a noble who had his lands taken from him by Prince John because he was loyal to King Richard. Robin also watched John's tax collectors change tax rates at whim and take all of the earnings the artisans and freemen/journeymen in and around Sherwood earned. John claimed the taxes were for the "war effort". Yet the majority of those taxes never went to King Richard or his army. They went into the coffers of John and those few nobles loyal to him. John was a tyrant who believed everything belonged to him and the government. Robin believed that the artisans deserved what they earned and such was their private property. He saw the taxation as unrepresented and illegal. So, he attacked the tax men and returned the earnings to those who earned them. He did not "steal from the rich". He stole from the tyrant and returned to the prosperous.
You make the very false claim that I did not get emotional over the slaughter of the innocents. I did. However, the law is no place for emotion. It is the place for reason. Emotions are fleeting. They come and they go. Reason and logic have greater longevity. There are many truths that are timeless. Emotions, however, have a very short life.
In addition, your grammar is atrocious. Perhaps you need to return to fifth grade.
Thank you for further exemplifying the ignorance of socialists. Thank you for demonstrating the mindset of the "useful idiots". Thank you for showing us that it is the left who is full of hate and racist statements. Thank you for showing everybody how the left is devoid of reason, logic, and facts. thank you for showing everybody your unfounded, baseless hatred towards anybody who is educated and erudite. You do a wonderful job of proving me correct.
I also find it hilarious that you attempt to distract from the points in this article with your false statements. Tell me why, my cowardly anonymous critic who lacks the backbone to use his name, did you not leave this comment on the article that covered the subject you addressed?
Delete